Archive for the ‘Social Media Marketing’ Category

Dear Corporate America, stop creating your own social networks!

Wednesday, February 25th, 2009

Every so often a new technology comes along and fascinates and excites businesses and consumers alike. Previously, e-commerce won our hearts. Then we all fell for search engines, and the world wide web was redefined. Now, that new technology is social networking and it’s an exciting place to be. New technology sprouts each week, creating interesting niche networking opportunities for anything you can think of. The world is becoming connected, and businesses are catching on this time a little earlier than they did with e-commerce and search engines.

So what’s the problem? These people are not built to be early adopters. Corporate America, listen up - stop creating your own social networks. You are missing the point entirely, and it’s going to create a backlash that could harm the real potential of social networking. Sears, just because you partnered with MTV, you are not suddenly cool and creating a stand alone social network around back-to-school shopping just isn’t the right thing to do. Let me explain what you are doing wrong, and why.

There are many social networks out there that have become a part of people’s lives. These web based networks are breaking down barriers and connecting people in ways that weren’t previously imaginable. With all this wonderful connectedness, it’s completely confusing why companies of any size would think that they had a product or corporate brand that was SO fascinating as to compete with the likes of Facebook and Myspace. Besides being blindly arrogant to the point of being comical, why does this matter? Because, the value in social media is creating networks and connecting people - not using disparate social networks to separate people. One of two things is going to occur. Either the site will be wildly successful and build a community of like minded people who worship that particular brand and reduce their interactions on other social networks, OR, an extremely small number of people will join your social network and your marketing team will be forced to say that “social media marketing” didn’t work for your company. Which sadly, will not be true at all.

Think about the missed opportunity when a company decides to forgo participation in the greater social community to instead create their own closed network.
1. They are forcing customers to divide their time among networks. (Bad idea)
2. Consumers who choose to participate in the network are connecting with other people already passionate about the product or brand, with no ability to spread the network virally among their other friends online who might not know about the brand.

They lose the benefit of network effects generated by being able to connect to various people with different interests all over the world. These companies who start their own social networks are saying, “I’m happy just serving our existing customers.” It’s terrible, and it’s a total misuse of the technology.

What should they be doing?

Build on your loyal fanbase within existing networks and social media sites to better leverage the network effects of these larger communities. Build affinity groups within Facebook and Myspace, use Twitter to build a network virally, start or join a group on Linkedin…there are so many different ways to creatively use social networking to BUILD a network that will provide much better results than creating your own closed network. FUJIFILM cameras wouldn’t decide to start their own tv channel because tv advertising was all the rage, so it’s not obvious to me why companies like Fuji are creating their own separate social networks because that’s the hottest new technology to hit the business magazine rack.

Can you list some examples of large brands/companies that ARE doing social media well?

Personification of Brand

Friday, September 5th, 2008
New Blog

Abbey Klaassen at Adage wrote an article titled “Microsoft’s New Spot From Crispin Is an Ad About Nothing (So Far)” and my first response to the new Microsoft spot was similar. I posted this to Twitter immdiately: @cherp “That was THE microsoft commercial? Really? Crispin Porter delivered that…”

I realized today that the new Microsoft spot is the same as what I’ve been recommending to companies about Twitter - in the age of social networking successful marketing is going to be about the personfication of brand. Twitter provides a way for individuals to connect with you, or your brand, in a more personal way. I connect with people daily, read their tweets, gain insight about them, and come to feel like I know them. Despite only being a 50×50 icon and 140 characters, my tweeps are real people to me - even the brands I follow. A machine can send email, you can outsource your call center, but Twitter (for now) requires a real person.

Microsofts new ad campaign, in my opinion is trying to accomplish the same thing. To counter Apple’s “I’m a Mac” ads, Microsoft needed to be human again. Bill Gates IS Microsoft, and as smart as Crispin Porter is they should get Bill Gates on Twitter immediately - joking about his retirement and how he now has time to do things like Twitter. Microsoft needs personification of brand because to many they are just this giant, rich, forceful brand that tried to take over the world (and forced us to use Internet Explorer.) The current Twitter user base is a perfect place for Microsoft and Crispin Porter to look next. With a heavy Mac contingency, and the potential to reach so many bloggers, I hope to see them join the ranks soon.

Watching Bill Gates speak, it’s hard to see him as this modern conqueror of the tech age. For Microsoft, being human means allowing people to develop a personal connection to the brand. Apple seems to have been able to do this from the beginning, for other brands it’s going to take the right advertising and the right action. Twitter is one example of how companies can create a more personal connection through action beyond advertising and it’s a critical component to a personification strategy if the brand wants to achieve long term benefit.

Consider this, while many companies are finally starting to adopt blogs as a way to reach consumers more regularly with their message - are blogs still so controlled and edited that they lose the personal touch that a blog is intended to imbue? I think this is why bloggers keep flocking to Twitter, and why it could be the lynchpin in strategies to personify one’s brand.

Twitter Marketing Statistics from Cherp

Tuesday, September 2nd, 2008
New Blog

We’ve been working hard to finish up our first few case studies, and as a part of that we’ve been gathering data on Twitter users that we feel backs up our case for Twitter as a marketing and branding platform.

Part of our research was to do research on 1000 random Twitter users, and measure the following information:

1. How do Twitter users access their Twitter account? (twitter.com, SMS, iPhone App, Blackberry App, other mobile app, blog or browser plugin)
2. % of Twitter users that are openly with a business (must have a URL to a business website in their profile)
3. Was the business user a techie/designer/other
4. % of Twitter users with an active blog linked from their profile
5. % of Twitter users with blog who actively promote the blog (10% of tweets link to blog)
6. % of users who work in social media in some capacity (non blog)
7. What % of Twitter users follow a brand (defined as a Twitter user using a brand name and a not posting for personal reasons)
8. What % of the brands followed were B2C or B2B
9. % of Twitter users employed in the media (TV/RADIO/NEWSPAPER/NON-BLOG WEBSITE)
10. % of Twitter users with at least 25% of their posts made from a mobile device
11. % of users who are actively promoting something versus simply tweeting
12. # of followers
13. # following the Twitter user

Since most of this information isn’t made public by Twitter, we needed to poll a large enough number to gather better statistics on the more than 2M active users.

For example, according to Compete.com Twitter had roughly 2.25M unique visitors (Quantcast has the number of people visiting Twitter at 1.5M.)

This is that magical hockey stick shaped growth that start-ups consider the ultimate sign of success. These numbers may not tell the whole story. The iPhone App Store offers 8 Twitter specific apps, and 2 others that allow users to post to Twitter. This doesn’t include the large number of blog or browser plugins, downloadable applications like Twhirl and sites like FriendFeed. When you consider this with our research which shows only 50% of Twitter users post from www.twitter.com, that number appears to be far greater.

Facebook may have 100M users, but with a closed network users are limited to a smaller segment of that 100M. Twitter’s open network and integration of search (after acquiring Summize a few months ago) means that Twitter offers the potential for much larger personal networks.

Stay tuned this week for more information from our research and the release of our first case study.

Cherp Reaches the Alltop

Monday, September 1st, 2008

What’s amazing is, we’re just getting warmed up!

Alltop, all the top stories

Creative ways to use Twitter, 2.

Monday, August 25th, 2008
New Blog

My last post “Creative ways to leverage Twitter” received some very positive emails and feedback.

Paul F. said: “I thought Twitter was a useless toy at first, but now I see it has potential to be a great tool.”

Someone identified as geek2.0 sent me a note that said: “Loved your post about Twitter. I have a feeling it’s going to be the big star out of web 2.0 sites, maybe more than Facebook.”

What are some other creative uses of Twitter?

I’ve been scouring Twitter looking for another example of an interesting way to use Twitter. For the most part, it’s more of the same. But it occurred to me that if a company were inclined, Twitter could be a great replacement for forums, and the networking nature could provide a benefit that forums don’t - new customers. What do I mean?

With a forum, users register to be able to read and post to the forum. Other users comment, and if the forum is run by or moderated by a company (an example is technical support forums for software) than frequently you get responses from company representatives. This is fine if you want the conversations to be fairly encapsulated within the forum. But what if you want to use the forum to grow your business? Having existing customers talk about your product with other existing customers can drive self-service behaviors, drive down support costs, but most importantly can spread positive word of mouth. How can Twitter be an equal or better option to existing forums?

Twitter provides a more public forum and allows people who are already using the site to network a new way to interact with your brand, using a social network they are already participating in. Now not only do other customers see their posts about your brand, but so does the rest of their network (and anyone searching on Google for that matter.) It leverages the network effects of Twitter not just to solve the problem or answer the question, but also to raise awareness of the brand.

Another considerable benefit of using Twitter as a forum is the transparency this gives to the company’s technology and support. Now users can hear how others are using the product, or solving the problem, or unique ways they’ve been able to leverage whatever widgets the company builds. Sure, this could be a problem if your customers hate your product or you have frequent trouble keeping things working - but frankly if this is the case then transparency isn’t your concern.

If you are a technology company and you offer (and meet) your SLA requirement in your terms of service, why not make that entire interaction public? Get the search engine visibility, PR or blog promotion, and network benefits of using a site like Twitter as your help desk. One of the biggest complaints of many software customers is the agony of having to submit a support issue through the automated attendant, or the online trouble ticket software that may or may not net you a response. With Twitter, your customers may end up solving each other’s problems - saving you time and resources.

What’s cool about Twitter is that it’s a blank canvas. It’s a new communication tool with a world of possibilities. Any other ideas for creative ways to use Twitter?

What Zappos and Barack Obama have in common.

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Zappos is one of the top retailers on the web, selling loads of shoes and building a stellar reputation for customer support. Great support has been a mantra of the organization since inception, and recent changes to the company marketing strategy simply reinforce this. Zappos is successful, because they embraced the web early and didn’t try to force it into old business paradigms.

Zappos success, and the success of Barack Obama (democratic political candidate for President) have something in common. They understand the difference between using the internet to drive traffic - and harnessing the network effects of communicating online. Both are heavily invested in social networking - many, if not most Zappos employees have a Twitter account. Obama and his team created groups and profiles on every major and minor social network, and leveraged Youtube extensively to spread the message. One of the most successful viral campaigns of the last few years, Will.i.am’s “Yes we can” video may go down in history due to it’s viral success.

What this company and this candidate understand, and what you can take away from their experience is that being visible on the web through SEO/SEM is very different from this all inclusive web strategy that includes blogs, blog outreach, social media, video and personal networking. When you wonder if all this Web 2.0 “stuff” is for real, think about the first term Senator from Illinois who defeated the Clintons on his way to running for President.

Yes, you are a brand now.

Monday, August 25th, 2008

When you speak with many executives and marketers, the concept of a “brand” is something they are comfortable with discussing and frequently can tell you the difference between their brand strategies and other marketing efforts. Having worked with many small businesses, the idea of their company being a “brand” is unclear, as are the strategies that go along with it. Some will argue that their company has no brand, usually due to a lack of logo or “designed” brand identity. But thanks to search engines, it’s time for everyone to realize that yes - you are a brand now. Fortune 1000 companies, small and medium businesses, and even bloggers are brands now too.

If I’m supposed to be a brand, do I need a logo now?

Let’s break the misconception that a brand is intrinsically tied to the ‘logo’ - it’s not. I’m a brand. I write and produce content online under my name, which is how I’m recognized. My name stands for a certain perspective, a particular type of content, a writing style and is further defined by everything I produce. This is a brand - it’s how the world identifies you. IBM needs a clear logo and color scheme so that as diversified as they are, when they release a new product or service offering you can identify it with their brand. Years of being IBM defined their brand, so their logo and the blue color represents how and what everyone feels about IBM. This allows them to do something new or innovative and tie it back using their recognized brand identity (their logo.) When I produce new content, I require other methods of “branding” that content since as an individual I don’t have a logo or branded color scheme. I use my name, picture, or style of writing to “brand” the content as mine. That said, I really would like a logo - I think that would make it all much easier.

What do I need to know about my brand?

Branding strategies are usually built on the idea of crafting a specific message in the market that will move your brand in a particular direction. For example, a company want’s to move upmarket into the Enterprise software space. To do this, they will need to launch a brand campaign around connecting their company to the enterprise. They will likely start with their website, redesigning and (possibly) rebranding completely to present a more “enterprise” friendly brand. Then they will have a SEO expert work their content, launch some SEM campaigns around it, print marketing and email marketing, and if they are smart - they will launch a social media campaign to get some momentum online. Your business is no different. You will need to do all of the same things, possibly in smaller doses, to get your brand “VISIBLE” online and offline. You need to think about your website, and how people find it, and work to “craft” your message about your brand.

You can either take control of your brand online, or bloggers and employees (sometimes ex-employees) will handle it for you.

For small businesses, managing your brand online can be as simple as adding a blog to your website and launching a social media campaign to improve and control your brand’s visibility online. This simply scratches the surface of what you can do to build your brand online, but anything you do will only strengthen your other marketing efforts. Online marketing, blogging, and social media have provided new opportunities for companies to build their brand, but the most important first step is to rethink what that means to your company and to start thinking about yourself and your company as the brand you want them to be.

Social Branding: Personal vs. Company

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Social media marketing gurus can be lumped into bunches - those that understand personal branding using social media, and those that understand how to translate that to business branding. If you are currently interested in social media marketing, or are researching for business purposes, you likely know that there are tons of self-proclaimed social media marketing “experts” who seem to talk a good game.

How do you tell who can help you and who can’t?

Good question, because in many cases these people will be using the same websites and some of the same methods to distribute their message. Some of them (not all, be careful) actually have been successful at branding themselves using social media - which is probably how you found them. The problem is, while someone might be really good at talking about themselves on social networks, they don’t always understand how companies must carefully craft their brands online - and how to combine these two efforts to achieve the goal of using social media marketing for business success.

Here’s what you look for…

1. Do they have a personal blog?

2. On this personal blog is it obvious who they work for in at least 3 posts?

3. Do the posts on the blog seem to be about the author, or the subject?

4. Are they leveraging social media effectively from their blog?

5. Do they list businesses as references, or other people?

6. Can they articulate a difference between using social media for personal gain versus business branding?

You may also ask, does it matter? Isn’t using social media beneficial either way? Won’t the sites be the same and thus, the processes be the same?

Yes and no. Using social media can be beneficial, but it’s about ROI. If your time is valuable, then it matters because while the sites may be the same the processes will differ somewhat. In both types of branding you are building your network based on your value to the greater “conversation”, but you don’t want to give away too much of that “value” as a business because you are supposed to be charging for it.

Keep in mind that some people are just trying to cash in on the emerging economy around social media marketing and look for help from people who can show you experience rather than a big ego.

Twitter tools (the Collected Works)

Monday, August 25th, 2008

In case it wasn’t apparent from previous posts, Twitter is my favorite social network. Of all social media sites, Facebook and Linkedin included, I would much prefer Twitter and use it far more. Not only has Twitter been one of the more enjoyable of the web 2.0 technologies, it’s spawned some amazingly helpful tools to get more out of the technology.

Here is a collection of the most useful or interesting Twitter tools (that I’ve found.)

Summize - This is actually THE Twitter search engine.

Tweetburner.com - Metrics for your links on Twitter.

Tweetscan - Another Twitter search engine, but a very useful one.

Twellow - It’s a different kind of Twitter search, that’s more focused on finding and classifying people, than just giving you a list of tweets by content.
Twitterific - If you have an iPhone, and use Twitter, you probably already have this app. If you don’t have an iPhone this is a great reason to go get one.

Twhirl - I will caveat this by saying I don’t actually USE Twhirl. I did. I’ve downloaded it a couple of times. I can’t get into using it. It’s a cool app, though.

Twittervision - It’s cool, but totally useless. It’s not a Twitter client, it doesn’t aggregate, it will help you make many minutes of your life disappear. Of course, I visit it at least once a day.

Twitter Netvibes Widget - Netvibes is a type of widgetized feed reader and I like it quite a bit. Each feed is visually encapsulated in it’s widget, making them easy to keep apart and scan easily.

Twitpic - I just learned about this and I’m very excited. It allows you to post pictures to Twitter.

Tweetbeep.com - Like Google Alerts, but for Twitter. MUST USE THIS!

I’m sure there are many missing. Please tell me all the cool stuff I’ve missed in comments.